TechPar
Benchmark total technology cost against stage-adjusted ranges. Built for IC packages, board reporting, and sell-side preparation.
How to use TechPar
TechPar benchmarks your total technology cost against stage-adjusted ranges derived from KeyBanc, OpenView, Bessemer, and GST engagement data.
Who it's for: PE deal teams, portfolio company CTOs and CFOs, and board-level reporting.
What you'll need: Annual recurring revenue (ARR) and monthly infrastructure spend at minimum. Additional cost categories (personnel, R&D, CapEx) unlock deeper analysis.
How it works: Select your company stage, enter revenue and costs, and TechPar computes a blended technology cost ratio with zone classification, gap analysis, and 36-month trajectory projection.
Company profile
Stage and revenue drive all benchmark ranges. Everything else adapts to what you enter here.
Historical data (optional)
Add 1-2 prior fiscal years to show actual trajectory on the chart. Enter the annual ARR and total technology spend for each year.
Technology costs
Enter annual spend across each cost category. Infrastructure hosting is required. All others are optional and unlock additional KPIs.
Analysis
Technology cost structure benchmarked against stage-adjusted ranges.
to compute TechPar.
| Seed / Pre-A | 60–100% |
| Series A | 45–75% |
| Series B–C | 35–55% |
| PE-backed | 25–40% |
| Enterprise | 18–32% |
How TechPar works
Benchmark sources
Ranges are informed by KeyBanc SaaS Survey (2024), OpenView Benchmarks (2024), Bessemer State of the Cloud (2024), and calibrated against GST engagement experience (2023–2025). Benchmarks are reviewed annually and represent the interquartile range of technology cost as a percentage of revenue at each growth stage.
Zone threshold derivation
Each company stage defines five thresholds that partition spend into six zones. The healthy range (low/high) represents the benchmark interquartile range. Below that, an underinvestment floor flags spend levels that may constrain engineering velocity or platform reliability. Above the healthy ceiling, the above-par, elevated, and critical thresholds flag increasingly significant cost drag. Thresholds are stage-specific: early-stage companies carry higher healthy ranges (60–100% at Seed) than mature companies (18–32% at Enterprise).
Gap calculation
The 36-month cumulative excess is computed by projecting monthly revenue forward at your stated growth rate, then summing the difference between your technology cost ratio and the stage ceiling in each month where spend exceeds the ceiling. For PE-backed and Enterprise stages, this excess is multiplied by the exit multiple to estimate the implied impact on recoverable exit value.
Trajectory projections
The trajectory chart projects a constant technology cost ratio against growing revenue over 36 months. It assumes costs scale linearly with revenue at the current ratio. Actual trajectory depends on optimization decisions, scaling dynamics, and organizational changes not captured in this model.
Limitations
TechPar provides a directional benchmark, not a precise diagnostic. It does not account for one-time costs, migration expenses, or business-model-specific factors. Category benchmarks assume a SaaS-oriented cost structure. Results should be interpreted alongside qualitative context and validated against company-specific circumstances.
Trajectory
36-month projection of total technology cost against the stage-adjusted healthy range.
to generate trajectory.